Research Data Management
Esta es una pagina interna de discusion.
Acceso esta restringido.
Introduccion al objetivo del grupo
Ver carta recibida, el objetivo es comentar el informe elaborado en el grupo de Research Data sobre Research Data Management Funding (ver siguiente apartado, apartado 1) y proponer comentarios, mejoras, etc. Y si se cree conveniente elaborar un statement propio del CSIC (ver apartado 2). Ademas se intentaran considerar otros temas muy afines en los grupos de Science Europe para tener una vision global del tema.
NOVEDADES
A- NUEVO BORRADOR DE DOCUMENTO SOBRE RDM FUNDING (7 MARZO 2016, si, mas de un año despues!)
Nuevo Borrador del documento en preparacion desde el grupo de Funding Research Data Infrastructure and Services
- (distribuido por e-mail a los miembros del grupo)
Comentarios hasta el proximo 10 de Marzo, ya que hay una reunion de Science Europe WG y Knowledge Exchange el dia 11
B- APORTACIONES DESDE RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES (17 DICIEMBRE 2015)
Joaquin Tintore me envia estos documentos de interes y relevancia para este grupo:
AGU Data Policy agu-data-policy.pdf
Science and Cyberinfrastructure cyberinfrastructure.pdf
Provenance provenance.pdf
C- CSIC DADO DE ALTA EN DATACITE Y EN ORCID (15 DICIEMEBRE 2015)
Desde Enero de 2016 ya estamos en DataCite como organizacion (por doa años inicialmente) y en ORCID. Mas informacion en breve.
1 El informe "Funding Research Data Infrastructure and Services"
Este informe en elaboracion dentro del grupo de Research Data basado en las dos tandas de cuestionarios distribuidas a traves de Science Europe.
El informe inicial preparado por un consultor y en colaboracion entre Science Europe y Knowledge Exchange se distribuyo por mail. Dicho informe no es publico y se trabaja en un nuevo resumen que sirva de base para un Workshop de Science Europe.
El resumen esta AUN en elaboración, es posible que haya una primera version a finales de Septiembre.
NOVEDADES (7 MARZO 2016, si, mas de un año despues!)
-Nuevo Borrador, Comentarios hasta 11 de Marzo (distribuido por e-mail a los miembros del grupo)
Puntos a considerar en la reunion:
1.1 Detección de temas de especial interés para el CSIC dentro del informe.
2 Documentos de posicionamiento relacionados con esta tematica en otros paises
Puntos a considerar en la reunion:
2.1 feedback para documento UK?
2.2 acuerdos/desacuerdos con vision de Alemania?
2.3 tiene sentido pensar en un documento similar desde CSIC? o bien mas tecnico ? o bien mas general? o apoyar algunos puntos de UK o de Alemania?
UK
A draft report by RCUK appeared (Monday 17 August): Concordat On Open Research Data http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/media/news/170814/
The OECD published back in 2007 already Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding, but these RCUK principles and recommendations are much more concrete.
Feedback is invited (before September 28).
It seems to be worthwhile to discuss these principles in a future SE working group meeting, because a great step forward could be made if these principles would be endorsed or adopted by SE and its member organisations. Probably the explanatory texts for each principle would need to be edited, as the current texts are oriented towards the UK national situation.
Principle #1 - Open access to research data is an enabler of high quality research, a facilitator of innovation and safeguards good research practice.
Principle #2 - Good data management is fundamental to all stages of the research process and should be established at the outset.
Principle #3 - Data must be curated so that they are accessible, discoverable and useable.
Principle #4 - Open access to research data carries a significant cost, which should be respected by all parties.
Principle #5 - There are sound reasons why the openness of research data may need to be restricted but any restrictions must be justified and justifiable.
Principle #6 - The right of the creators of research data to reasonable first use is recognised.
Principle #7 - Use of others’ data should always conform to legal, ethical and regulatory frameworks including appropriate acknowledgement.
Principle #8 - Data supporting publications should be accessible by the publication date and should be in a citeable form.
Principle #9 - Support for the development of appropriate data skills is recognised as a responsibility for all stakeholders.
Principle #10 - Regular reviews of progress towards open access to research data should be undertaken.
Alemania
The Working Group on Research Data in the Priority Initiative “Digital Information” of the Alliance of German Science Organisations has published its position paper "Research Data at Your Fingertips":
Keep in mind that this is not an official Allianz position, but just that of the working group.
3 Reunión sobre Text and Data Mining del 27 octubre 2015
Puntos a considerar en la reunion:
3.1 Comentarios sobre el documento propuesto (ver mas abajo link)
3.2 Puntos adicionales en relación con los temas de Open Science, Open Data, Licencias de explotacion de datos, etc.
3.3 Expertos que asistiran el dia 27 a la reunion y posibles sugerencias a SE
TDM Text and Data Mining: info to be distributed
In May 2015 the European Commission (EC) published a communication entitled "A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe"; it refers to the possibility to introduce an exception for Text and Data Mining (TDM) as part a likely reform of the EU copyright directive, as follows:
“Innovation in research for both non-commercial and commercial purposes, based on the use of text and data mining (e.g. copying of text and datasets in search of significant correlations or occurrences) may be hampered because of an unclear legal framework and divergent approaches at national level. The need for greater legal certainty to enable researchers and educational institutions to make wider use of copyright-protected material, including across borders, so that they can benefit from the potential of these technologies and from cross-border collaboration will be assessed, as with all parts of the copyright proposals in the light of its impact on all interested parties.”
In such context, and awaiting an EC proposal for the European copyright framework reform, Science Europe Working Group on Research Data organises a workshop on the importance of Text and Data (Content) Mining for science on 27 October 2015 in Brussels. The event will aim to demonstrate the relevance of content mining for science and its relevance as a commercial service and to illustrate that the Europe needs a clear legal framework accommodating for such uses.
You are kindly invited to save the date of this workshop and to disseminate this announcement through your channels. Further information will follow in the course of September.
The workshop will address senior representatives from Science Europe Member Organisations and Scientific Committees, research organisations in general and European institutions (European Commission, European Parliament).
The Briefing Paper ‘Text and Data Mining and the Need for a Science-friendly EU Copyright Reform’, by Science Europe Working Group on Research Data, will serve as background to the discussions (See: http://www.scienceeurope.org/urls/tdm).
TDM points from France
The French Government has been drafting a bill on digital issues during the last months.
The penultimate draft was ok, with an article on open access similar to the German law, and a TDM rights exception for research similar to the UK one.
The last version has lost the TDM article altogether and the OA article has been badly damaged, both as embargo periods have doubled and as the wording is now terrible.
For those who can read a bit of French here is a good source of information: http://www.cnrs.fr/dist/consultation-loi-numerique.html.
Fortunately, the law is open for contributions from citizens or stakeholders: http://www.republique-numerique.fr/pages/in-english
What can you do?
1. First, each of you can register to do a simple thing:
Vote and have all your friends vote « pas d’accord » (disagree) for article 9:
And vote and have all your friends vote « d’accord » (agree) for Renaud Fabre’s proposal:
Renaud Fabre’s proposal introduction explains why you should disagree with article 9.
2. The second thing we could do is as follow: I submit a contribution on behalf of "the members of the Science Europe Working Group on open access", or just "members" if some of you disagree with the idea.
I could very simply state a general agreement on the idea but restate the embargo periods that we have put in the Position Paper, and comment that longer periods in France would put French researchers at a disadvantage.
Please note that the consultation closes within less than three weeks, which can be short to get many votes.
4 Cuestionario sobre Regulacion en el Digital Single Market
Este cuestionario tiene mucha relacion con los puntos anteriores ya que marca la tendencia desde Bruselas sobre estos temas.
Puntos a considerar en la reunion:
4.1 Puntos de interes en este documento de cara a posicionarse en este area
4.2 Pensar si interesa contestarlo por parte de muchos investigadores
Cuestionario sobre Digital Single Market
Ya es oficial (24 Septiembre):
Estaba filtrado "oficialmente":
http://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Platforms-consultation.pdf
Entre otros puntos de interes incluye:
3.4.1 Free flow of data (pagina 16)
y en la pagina 18 cuestion 43: On access and reuse of (non-personal) scientific data
5 Puntos técnicos para CSIC
Puntos a considerar en la reunion:
5.1 Que soluciones tenemos / o podemos tener para Identificación de datos y a que nivel (DOI versus PID)
5.2 Interes de participar en DataCite
5.3 Interes de contar con un Portal de deposito/acceso a datos y de software de reanalisis
Data Cite
Presentacion sobre DataCite: datacite.pdf
Portal de datos basados en Invenio
6 Contexto
Contexto grupos de Science Europe
Papel relevante CSIC en apoyar vision de la importancia de datos
contexto EU
Calls WP 16-17 H2020
=== contexto ESFRIs ===
Portales, DOIs, etc
contexto ES
Rol del CSIC, interaccion con otros actores